Boko Haramis and their ilk

This is obviously a reworking of my earlier post. Written for Farooq Sulehria’s excellent Viewpointonline (http://viewpointonline.net/)

Boko Haram is a Nigerian
terrorist organization that claims to be fighting for the imposition of “pure
Islam” in Nigeria. The Northern parts of Nigeria have been components of many
Islamicate kingdoms and empires in the last few centuries, most recently the
Sokoto Caliphate (a large slave-owning empire that started as a violent Jihad
and was mostly run by Qadriyya Sufis who enforced Shariah law, thus creating
postcolonial studies discomfort at many levels). This empire was defeated by
the British and agreed to capitulate under fairly generous terms. The caliph
was retained as “Sultan” and retained some autonomy, but submitted to being a
British protectorate, etc…you know the drill. By the way, the Sultanate still
exists and supposedly has some “spiritual authority” as well as temporal
influence (though only a Nigeria expert can tell us how important that is, or is
not) and is headed by a Sultan who used to be the military attaché in Pakistan!
Connect the dots comrades 😉
Anyway, many people in
the North have more than a passing loyalty to strict Islamicate mores, and
ideas of Jihad and Shariah law were never far from the surface (though managed fairly well by the Brits, who told the Khalifa that prayer, Zakat and family life will not be interfered with, thus giving him the necessary fig leaf; imperialists who knew what they were about). The Nigerian
government introduced Shariah law into its Northern provinces (states) starting
in 1999 and this probably reflected the wishes of many, if not most, people in
those states. But the Nigerian government (corrupt to the core) remained in
charge and obviously did not satisfy those thirsting for more authentic
Jihadism and Shariah. It is not hard to imagine that this thirst was also
increased by Saudi money and propaganda, but again, a Nigeria expert will have
to step in to provide such details.  

Whatever
the details, some section of true believers managed to get into a violent
conflict with the Federal state. In this, they may have been supported, or at
least ignored, by many “moderate Muslims” in the North who had their own
conflicts and competition with Southern (mostly Christian) Nigerians, or with local rivals. Again,
the details are not for us to parachute in and reveal. Nigerians will have to
do that job. But what we do find of interest is that Boko Haram (the word means
modern education is a sin, perhaps more generally, that Westernization is a
sin) has now become a menace of tremendous size and 3 weeks ago, they kidnapped
250 plus girls from a boarding school and now they are threatening to sell them as slaves (a practice for which they claim Shariah backing; but this seems to strerch even Shariah notions of capturing enemy girls a bit, since these girls are enemies? exactly how?). 
The generally
incompetent, internally divided and corruption ridden (they have had their own
long martial laws) Nigerian armed forces have been unable to do much to rescue
the poor girls till now and after some weeks the leader of the Boko Haram,
Abubakar Shikau (a man the Nigerian armed forces claimed to have killed several
years ago; like our own blessed “bad jihadis” he seems to have nine lives) has
emerged on video to take “credit” for this kidnapping. 


This video and the
prolonged agony of the poor parents (and the heartless attitude of the Nigerian
Federal Government) have managed to put this particular “non-western”
alternative form of social organization, i.e. the partly imaginary, partly
historical “Islamic model”, front and center. I learn from Wikipedia
(and from at least one Nigerian commentator) that this Abubaker Shikau
is “bookish” and was once known as “Dar ul Tauheed” (the house of Tauheed; Tauheed being the
oneness of Allah and the preferred name the Wahabis have for their own
ideology). Subhanallah. Here he is on video:
The video, as you can see
(though of course, thanks to Zardari and MNS, you cannot see in Pakistan)
starts with Quranic verses and Jihadi slogans and bears more than a little
resemblance to similar efforts from the Pakistani Taliban. The people who
produced this video (and carried out the girls kidnapping) obviously believe
they are on the right path and they are not doing something wrong; they are
fulfilling the will of Allah. In fact, they are the only people fulfilling the
will of Allah.
In this crucial respect
they are one step ahead of other murderous gangs in ungoverned African
countries (who are all capable of killing, kidnapping and raping). These
Boko Haramis have a coherent ideology with worldwide reach, and they sincerely
believe it is superior and is bound to triumph. In fact, so widespread are
sections of this ideology that most of this speech could be repeated without
adverse comment on PTV or Saudi TV (as long as you take out the specific
threats to the current rulers of Nigeria). The bit about marrying girls at 9
years old and 12 years old reflects a continuing (unfortunate) Islamic clerical obsession
with what we would now call pedophilia (though of course child marriage, with
or without early sex, was pretty much normal in most of the world for a
long time; being commonplace, though not universal, in India, China, the Middle
East and Africa).
This is a problem.

It is, first of all, a
practical problem; in the sense that murderous gangs with coherent ideologies
(that provide hope for victory as well as solidarity) have a longer life span
and greater staying power than murderous gangs that are just murderous gangs (see the
20th Century for many examples, most completely on display in glorious
Democratic Kampuchea).
Another aspect of the
problem can be seen in on display in what a White woman on twitter said yesterday (yes, yesterday, after all the news has been about): she doesn’t
believe this story; she said Boko Haram “sounds so Hollywood”.  She said it is “a Western front meant to
disrupt Africa to get at their natural resources”. I kid you not. She actually
said all this on twitter! In other words, one aspect of the problem is that it is so
strange to some modern ears that those unused to certain commonplace historical trends (people living their life in a small ideological bubble perhaps?) are simply unable to
grasp what is going on. But this is a minor aspect. Who cares what some activist or op-ed
writer for the Guardian thinks. There is a much bigger problem: the one faced by
moderate Muslims…
For 50 years, the
“moderate Muslim” response to the modern world has been based on
fictive loyalty to the perfect model of early Islam, and EXTREMELY selective
adoption of that model. This is an important point. There are Christians and
Jews and Hindus and who knows, Shintoists, who believe they follow the
“essence’ of their great (and superior) religion and tradition (the two
words are used interchangeably based on context and need) but who do not feel
bound to imitate every particular act or order of their glorious ancestors. In
fact, they are even willing to re-examine what those acts supposedly
were…which ones actually happened, which ones are likely fake, which ones are
apocryphal, which ones are now out of date, etc. But the “moderate Muslim” model adopted in most Muslim
countries (Turkey being a notable exception under the Ataturkists, but now
reverting to mean) adopted complete (insincere in many cases) agreement
with classical texts and traditional accounts of early Islam as the publicly
accepted consensus; while carrying on with very different lives by simply ignoring
inconvenient traditions and theological points.
My description of the
process as it happened in Pakistan was given in this earlier comment:
Phase 1:
“moderates” obtain license to rule from colonial powers and being
half-educated opportunists for the most part, and with some encouragement from
the CIA (whose own ignorance of such things is legendary; and whose primary aim
in any case was anti-communism at that point), some of them mindlessly repeat
“Islamic formulas” in designing the curriculum and ideology for their
new “nations”.
Phase 2: In Pakistan’s
case, a specific CIA project to arm and train Islamic terrorists for
Afghanistan, also leads to dissemination of tradecraft (how to make bombs, set
up secret cells, take hostages, spread terror, etc.) to specially selected
young morons. This is very important because ideology is not enough. You also
need to know how to blow stuff up. That is not knowledge we are born with. Of
course, all the while the magic curriculum adopted to “unite the nation” and
“fight communist infiltration” infects PMA level “strategists” with
just enough confusion to lose sight of their own future vulnerability to such
nonsense. The high level of corruption and nepotism also creates resentment,
pool of recruits, yadda yadda yadda. .
Phase 3. Idiot ruling
elite now includes haramis who actually believe in boko haram level BS. They
are a small minority (see Hamid Gul) but the majority of their colleagues (see
Musharraf) has been ideologically paralyzed by their own over-smart curriculum
and propaganda. BOOM BOOM BOOM…You know the rest.
But I do think it’s a
passing phase. If the haramis win, it’s over in a few years, if they lose, it’s
over in a few years.
But also, it will get
worse before it gets better. See the above video. We have trained similar
psychopaths in our Jihadi organizations. They will try to enforce their laws. Alhamdulillah.
I am going to post a
comment thread from Facebook here as it may explain some of what I mean:
Omar Ali:  Boko
haramis are going to send all of Karen Armstrong’s diligent apologia straight
to hell
13 hours ago · Like · 2
Amer: Sex slaves and trading of women was very
much part of Islamic history from day one so this man is just a shining example
of an Islamic tradition.
10 hrs · Like · 1
Omar Ali: But to be fair, in early Islamic history all
this was very much within period norms. WTF are the haramis doing in THIS day
and age?
1 hr · Like
Ahmed : Well, if the general premise of Muslims is
that the Prophet’s actions and teachings are good for all times and all
humanity, then it’s quite natural to descend to this level of tragic absurdity.
1 hr · Edited · Like
Omar Ali: Ahmed you said “the general premise of
Muslims is that the Prophet’s actions and teachings are good for all times and
all humanity” …Yaah, but you know Muslims don’t really mean that (except
for the nutcases, retards and haramis, all of whom are in a minority). EVERYONE
i know selectively borrows from the Quran and even more selectively from hadith
and mostly ignores both. That’s just a meaningless line people repeat because
they learned to repeat it in Islamiyat class. It’s not taken THAT seriously.
Look around you.
1 hr · Like
About Pakistan in
particular, someone asked if and when this may happen here? I think the
Pakistani state is an order of magnitude more competent than the basket-case
Nigerian institutions. so I think right now this is unlikely on this scale. But
smaller scale events will surely happen and are already happening…
Of course, the Pakistani state
and army have to come out of their Islamiyat-Pakstudies stupor to recover and move on. They
may do it. They may not. If not, what then?
(please see my explanation of this scenario building in a separate post)
Here is my summary of
who may be in a position to save us if the Pak army fails to change course (I
sincerely pray to Allah that they do NOT fail)

1. IF the army fails to
change direction, Punjab will have a short but terrible religious apocalypse. It’s
inevitable in Punjab because Pakistaniat and Islamiyat are widely established and there is simply no armed group that can match
the Jihadis if the army is gone. But post-apocalypse, we can be saved by the Khalsa.
By that I don’t mean the literal Khalsa of yore, I just that once shariah law and jihadi rule is discredited (as it inevitably will be), Sikh rule may be
the nearest palatable alternative, perhaps under overall Indian control. We can all hope and pray it does
not come to that.
2. Pakhtoons can only be
saved by Afghanistan. IF the army fails to change course, then there is simply
no armed force IN KP that can fight the jihadis. But Afghanistan has an army…
3. The Baloch can only
be saved by China (i.e. if the Chinese switch sides). No further explanation is
necessary.
4. The Sindhis can only
be saved by? …India? I don’t know. I await input on this one.
I will also say this
(since some Pankaj Mishra fan is sure to bring up “the Western nation state is not
the only model’ yadda yadda yadda):  Yes.
The modern (“Western”) model of the nation state is not the only way
society can be organized. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Show
me where Haramis or Trotskyites or Leninists have created something better and genuinely different and we can talk.
Cuba, for example, is a
modern nation state. More socialist than most and not as liberal as some (though maybe to the liberal side
of others that still managed to survive). The essential elements of a modern state can be defined by academics, but seem to include borders, an army (except, I am told, in Costa Rica, bless their souls), the police, bureaucracy, schools, colleges, exams, nationalism, propaganda, etc.
in no particular order. Various political systems (modern social democracy
being the best of the lot till now?) can manage this state. And of course, avowed Marxists and Leninists have managed them too…I just meant that they managed them as modern states, not as some
alternative “system” that rejects modern states. 
Something like that. More on this later..

How to crush a woman (use a woman-rock)

Heigh-ho a dairy-o, a hunting we will go! A-hunting we will go, a hunting we will go. 
We’ll catch a fox and put ’em in a box, and then we’ll (not) let him go.  

One has to admire the skill, the viciousness with which the butchering was done, the high priestess sitting on her throne in New York, destroying a 20 year old barely legal woman in favor of the rich and the powerful man (with his woman standing right behind). And how the organic food eating, Afghanistan girl saving, elites loved it all. They gave her a bloody Pulitzer. 

And then she gets to re-write history, to whitewash away her own sins. The cruelty is astonishing. How can a woman hurt another woman so much? 
……………

 In 1998, a week rarely went by where Lewinsky’s name did not appear in
Dowd’s column. When the scandal broke in January of that year, Dowd was
initially sympathetic to Lewinsky and damning of an administration that
rushed to smear her in a bid to cover its own ass.

It didn’t take long for Dowd
to buckle under the power of the Clinton narrative and join the pile-on
herself. By February, she was calling Lewinsky “a ditsy, predatory
White House intern who might have lied under oath for a job at Revlon”
and “the girl who was too tubby to be in the high school ‘in’ crowd.” At
first, Dowd attempted to pass this nastiness off as a sly, satirical
commentary on the caricature of Lewinsky that the Clinton administration
had painted in the press. But soon, the artifice disappeared, and Dowd
devoted her column to arguing that, come to think of it, Lewinsky was both nutty and slutty.

In May, Lewinsky was asked to submit a handwriting sample to the FBI,
and Dowd wrote a satirical column imagining the scene. “Her
stream-of-consciousness ramblings are on F.B.I. letterhead—in a girlish
scrawl, with loopy letters, little hearts and breathless punctuation,”
Dowd said. “Here’s what she wrote: Monica Clinton. Monica Lewinsky
Clinton. Monica Lewinsky Rodham Clinton. Mrs. Big Creep. (Frowny face.)
First Lady Monica. (Smiley face.) Menu for MY Italian State Dinner:
Spaghetti Carbonara. Tiramisu. Spumoni. Table placement: Me between
Leonardo DiCaprio & John Travolta. Also, cannoli.”

By June, no level of Lewinsky news was beneath Dowd’s scorn. She wrote that Lewinsky’s Vanity Fair
photo shoot had “shades of JonBenet Ramsey” and that “It appears that
there’s one thing Monica has immunity from: brains.” That same month,
Dowd happened to run into Lewinsky while both were dining at
Washington’s Bombay Club, so she transcribed the contents of Lewinsky’s
dinner plate (“veggie appetizers and chicken tandoori”) and claimed that
her presence at the White House–adjacent restaurant “suggested the
former intern was still trying to grab the President’s attention, like
some love-struck teen-ager, loitering outside Billy Clinton’s biology
class.”
 

Nearing the end of the summer, Dowd had tired of her characterization
of Lewinsky as a naïve Valley Girl and advanced her argument to claim
that Lewinsky was the real harasser. In August, Dowd compared Lewinsky
to Glenn Close’s bunny-stewing murderess in Fatal Attraction
and wrote that “Monica has at least one special talent: she is
relentless. It was the quality that got her noticed by Bill Clinton, and
it is the quality that will prevent him from ever escaping her.” The
occasion for this observation was Lewinsky’s agreement to appear in
front of a grand jury as requested—how tastelessly aggressive. 

In
September, Dowd penned Lewinsky’s book proposal for her: “Preface:
Powerful men who are busy running things aren’t as hard to get as you
think. It’s really, really easy if you show a little gumption and a lot
of cleavage.” Later that month, she wrote, “It is Ms. Lewinsky who comes
across as the red-blooded predator, wailing to her girl friends that
the President wouldn’t go all the way.” And, “It is Mr. Clinton who
behaves more like a teen-age girl trying to protect her virginity. …
Ms. Lewinsky is the one who bristles with testosterone.”

In October, Dowd called Lewinsky a dingbat. Then, in November, she
decreed that Lewinsky’s 15 minutes were up. “Her commercial window of
opportunity is slamming shut,” Dowd wrote. “The nation, once glued to
the soap opera of Monica and Bill, has canceled the show. … Monica must
be in a panic to squeeze the last drop of profit from this sordid tale.”
Nevertheless, it was Dowd who kept writing about Lewinsky week after
week, capitalizing on her crazed bimbo character for the better part of
1999.

Fast-forward to 2006. Monica Lewinsky is laying low at the London
School of Economics, and Maureen Dowd, hard up for news fodder, writes a
think piece about how the term slut is wielded against women.
She reaches back into the Lewinsky file to lend some historical context:
“Republicans denigrated the prim law professor Anita Hill by painting
her, in David Brock’s memorable phrase, as ‘a little bit nutty and a
little bit slutty.’ Clinton defenders demonized Monica Lewinsky the same
way.” Huh. Is that what happened?

While Lewinsky expresses regret for her ill-fated
relationship with Clinton—and many Americans have come to realize
that Lewinsky got a raw deal—Dowd is not yet ready to assume
responsibility for her own role. On the occasion of Lewinsky’s
reappearance, Dowd has this to say: “It was like a Golden Oldie tour of a
band you didn’t want to hear in the first place.” What Dowd doesn’t
seem to get: She was the one beating the drum.

…………….
Link: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/05/monica_lewinsky_returns_how_maureen_dowd_caricatured_bill_clinton_s_mistress.html
…………
regards

America ka matlab kya? (Christians are #1)

We have always appreciated America as a secular paradise (even though Europe probably has more non-religious people) because of its firm division between Church and State, which in translation means (to us) that religion stays away from the public square but if it is allowed in then all religions (as well as non-religion) speak from the same level platform.

The U.S.
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2012 that the Greece town council
had gone too far, citing the “steady drumbeat” of Christian prayers.

Obviously this is a bit of an ideal scenario, there is a strong flavor of Christianity in most things that Americans enjoy and/or celebrate and that was just fine. As far as official America is concerned the fact that you may be a Hindu-American (a term that we are not personally fond of) is of no consequence or if it matters it does so in a good way (diversity!!!).

“one of the greatest moments in U.S. Senate history came when a
Christian group recently shouted for God to forgive us during the
opening prayer of a Hindu in the Senate.”

Now however we have the latest Supreme Court judgement and the likely (official) consequences of that ruling: Christianity (#1), Judaism (tolerated, Israel is where we will all go to die), Buddhism (we are aware of beaten-up Tibet but not much about the beatings in Burma and Sri Lanka), Hinduism (monkey gods), Wiccan (Harry Potter)…..

“Buddha didn’t create us. Muhammad didn’t create us. It’s the
God of the Holy Scripture,” he explained.

It is also interesting to note that (3) Jewish justices and (1) non-practicing Catholic justice voted against while the five Catholic justices voted for Christian prayers in the public square.
…………

The dissenters, led by Justice Elena Kagan, said the court had
crossed a line by approving a policy of “religious favoritism.” She said
the majority might view the case differently if a “mostly Muslim town”
decided to open its meetings with Muslim prayers or a Jewish community
always invited a rabbi to open its official proceedings.

“When the
citizens of this country approach their government, they do so only as
Americans, not as members of one faith or other,” she wrote. “They
should not confront government-sponsored worship that divides them along
religious lines.”

The case began when a town supervisor in Greece, N.Y., near Rochester,
decided to invite local clerics to open the town’s monthly meetings with
a prayer.  
Between 1999 and 2007, all of the participating ministers
were Christian.

Two residents who regularly attended the meetings, Susan Galloway,
who is Jewish, and Linda Stephens, who is not religious, complained to
the supervisor and then filed suit. They contended the town’s policy of
sponsoring Christian prayers violated the 1st Amendment’s ban on an
“establishment of religion.”

No one disputed that the town could
open its meetings with a religious invocation. The Supreme Court in 1983
upheld legislative prayers in a Nebraska case. But it was unclear
whether such official prayers could invoke Jesus Christ.

The U.S.
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2012 that the Greece town council
had gone too far, citing the “steady drumbeat” of Christian prayers. That
decision relied heavily on the opinions of former Justice Sandra Day
O’Connor, who helped forge a previous majority around the idea that the
government may not endorse or favor any particular religion.

But
the current Supreme Court reversed the 2nd Circuit ruling and rejected
the lawsuit. Ceremonial prayers are constitutional, Kennedy said, so
long as they do not “denigrate nonbelievers or religious minorities,
threaten damnation or preach conversion.”

Thomas would have gone
further and said the 1st Amendment does not forbid states or cities from
establishing an official religion. Thomas says the 1st Amendment, when
it was adopted, limited only the federal government.

Though the case involved a town council, the ruling applies to all levels of government, including state and county boards.

………….
In a significant shift from earlier case law,
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that local government “cannot require
chaplains to redact the religious content from their message to make it
acceptable for the public sphere.” From now on, religious leaders can
offer full-throated, unapologetic prayers to the God of their choosing
in public meetings. 

And in language consistent with one of the most
speech-protective courts in modern history, Kennedy reminds religious
objectors that citizens who “feel excluded or disrespected” by such
religious invocations should simply ignore them. “Adults often encounter
speech they find disagreeable,” he wrote.

Whenever you hear cries that freedom has won, it’s worth
contemplating who, if anyone, has lost. And less than 24 hours after the
Court handed down its decision in Town of Greece, citizens of Roanoke, Virginia, have their answer.
Al Bedrosian, a member of the Roanoke County’s board of supervisors,
was sufficiently emboldened by the majority opinion to announce that he
would seek to impose a Christian-only prayer policy. 

“The freedom of religion doesn’t mean that every religion has to be
heard,” said Bedrosian on Monday night, adding that he is concerned
about groups such as Wiccans and Satanists. “If we allow everything …
where do you draw the line?” he asked.

Kennedy’s plurality
opinion Monday opened the door to precisely this line of argument as a
result of all his airy talk of religious tradition and history. “The
tradition reflected in Marsh permits chaplains to ask their own
God for blessings of peace, justice, and freedom that find appreciation
among people of all faiths,” writes Kennedy.  

“That a prayer is given in
the name of Jesus, Allah, or Jehovah, or that it makes passing
reference to religious doctrines, does not remove it from that
tradition.”

He adds that “it is thus possible to discern in the prayers offered
to Congress a commonality of theme and tone. While these prayers vary in
their degree of religiosity, they often seek peace for the Nation,
wisdom for its lawmakers, and justice for its people, values that count
as universal and that are embodied not only in religious traditions, but
in our founding documents and laws.”

In other words, because the prayers offered in the town of Greece abided
by this long “tradition,” they are, in Kennedy’s view, acceptable. Even
when explicitly Christian. Why? “A number of the prayers did invoke the
name of Jesus, the Heavenly Father, or the Holy Spirit, but they also
invoked universal themes, as by celebrating the changing of the seasons
or calling for a ‘spirit of cooperation’ among town leaders.” 

What
Kennedy did here, in the event that you missed it, was to announce that
as a matter of constitutional law, some religious traditions that are
universal and longstanding are basically Christian and also that
Christian values are basically universal. 

But in so doing
he also drew a line between “traditional” and accepted religions, and
religions that are “other.” That seems to open the door for Bedrosian to
zone out the Muslims and the Jews and for Moore to zone out the
Buddhists and (surprise!) the Muslims.
…………
Link (1): http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-court-prayer-20140506-story.html
Link (2): http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/05/town_of_greece_v_galloway_roanoke_virginia_already_seeing_the_effects_of.html
……….
regards

“I reached the village everything was finished”

If you disturb sacred tribal lands, be prepared to pay a heavy price…including seeing your little child drowning in front of you. Next time, the migrant population must learn from their mistakes and vote for a Bodo leader....who will call for the muslims to be evicted from sacred lands.

The prime accused (by the muslims) Pramila Rani Brahma and the Bodoland People’s Front is allied with the (Axom) Congress govt of Tarun Gogoi. The international community (and the progressive left within India) must hold Gogoi to the same standard that they have (justifiably) applied for Modi. These killings are especially egregious because it is a repeat from 2 years ago. Where are the Teesta Setalvads who will monitor the situation so as to prevent yet one more attack down the road?
……………
“We did not vote for the BPF candidate in Lok Sabha polls, that’s why we were attacked,” alleged 75-year-old Iman Ali.

Bodoland People’s Front, an ally of ruling Congress in Assam, is facing
accusations for the Friday bloodbath that left 36 people –mostly women
and children– dead with the affected families claiming that the
“planned” attack was a reprisal for voting for a non-Bodo candidate.

The victims of Narayanguri in Baksa district, along with the villagers
on East of Beki river, refuted government’s claim that the attack was
carried out by National Democratic Front of Bodoland’s IK Songbijit
faction –NDFB(S)– militants.

The Bodoland People’s Front (BPF), which evolved from the Bodo
Liberation Tigers militant outfit, has denied the allegations of
involvement in the May 2 carnage that targeted Muslim families.

“The killings took place days after BPF leader Promila Rani Brahma said
that Muslims did not vote for BPF. It seems like a planned attack,”
claimed Faridul Islam, who is living in a relief camp after the
violence.

“It is our democratic right to support anyone we wish. Bodos have always
tortured us. Almost every year, they do such kinds of massacre. Why
should we vote them?” asked Iman Ali, who lost his wife in the attack. 

 …….When
Halima Khatun jumped into the Beki river with her five-month-old child
to save his life from terrorists, she never thought it was the last time
she was holding her child. “Everywhere there was sound of
firing. Some people who ran towards the forest guards’ post were also
fired by them. I had no other option but to jump into the river,” Khatun
(30) told PTI here.

While fleeing, she left behind her
10-year-old daughter and 7-year-old son as she could not find them and
they are still untraceable.

Her husband was at the Bhangarpar market at the time of the attack.

“I tried to swim across the other side of the river, but could not. I
could not hold my infant child and he was washed away by strong current
of the river in front of my eyes. I found a stationary log in the water
and survived by holding on to it,” the inconsolable mother said.

She has not found the body of her child yet. “While in waters, the
gunmen were firing at us. Thankfully the bullets did not hit me, but many
who jumped to save their lives died,” Khatun said, adding she also lost
her two brother-in-laws in the attack.

The current of the
river was so strong that Khatun’s clothes were also washed away and Army
personnel rescued her after almost two hours and gave a ‘lungi’ to
cover her body.

Same is the story of other victims of the terrorist attacks in Narayanguri and Hagrabari villages of Baksa district.

Except three-four fortunate families, all the remaining 70-odd families have lost their loved ones.

“I lost my three sons and a daughter.Their bodies were lying in the
field when I reached there after an hour of the attack,” Ajimuddin Ali
(50) said.

Ali, who was away in Bhangarpar market along with
most of the men of the villages, ran to the river side after hearing
gunshots.

“But no boat was ready to cross the river fearing the
attack.I had to wait for an hour to cross.And when I reached the
village, everything was finished,” he said.

……………
Link (1): http://zeenews.india.com/news/general-elections-2014/assam-violence-victims-point-finger-at-bodoland-people-s-front_930170.html
Link (2): http://www.firstpost.com/india/killing-children-bodoland-militants-target-the-very-young-in-assam-1510477.html
……….

regards

The 51st state

This term as applied to England, Australia, Israel,…has a distinguished lineage associated with long running (benevolent) empires. During British rule this or that city would be referred to as the second city of the empire after London (Calcutta, Edinburgh,…).

There is now physical evidence that the 51st state is actually…Pakistan. No other explanation can satisfy the basic query- why an FBI agent is on active duty on Pak soil?

US officials in Washington confirmed that the agent, who is assigned to the FBI
Miami Field Office, was in Pakistan on temporary duty, the Washington Post
reported.
 
The government of Pakistan has denied issuing any invitations. All this shadowy business only helps sharpen the “dollar-khor” rhetoric espoused by Captain sahib. The USA should come clean on this matter- this is about securing the nuclear complex, right? Not to worry, this is the 21st century, we look forward to Wiki Leaks-II to tell us the whole story.

Final point: an American while traveling should know and respect local laws would never dare to carry live ammunition into an US flight. There seems to be no limit to imperial arrogance.

updates: 1) thanks to Asok for informing that US laws do allow ammunition in checked luggage,
2) it is not clear from reports if the bullets and (3) knives were in checked or hand luggage, either way the agent did violate Pakistani laws (ignorance is not an excuse), so the imperialism charge sticks
3) CNN reports that US agents have permission to be armed in Pakistan but only if authorized but flight luggage rules still apply, however this person was not authorized and clearly on a clandestine mission
4) the agent was not authorized to carry weapons and does not have diplomatic immunity, so shall we now see patriotic americans insisting that the book should be thrown at him (max 14 years in prison), just like that Indian lady a few months ago?
…….

An American, arrested on anti-terrorism charges at an
airport here after Pakistani authorities recovered 15 bullets and a pistol clip
from his possession, has been identified as an FBI agent.

Joel Cox was about to board a domestic flight to Islamabad at the Jinnah
International Airport on Monday evening when the Airport Security Force (ASF)
discovered 15 bullets of 9mm caliber and a pistol clip in his baggage.

He was detained by the ASF before being handed over to the airport police
station where a case was lodged against him.

Yesterday, Cox appeared in court on charges that he had violated local
anti-terrorism laws that prohibit carrying firearms or ammunition aboard
commercial flights, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in jail.

He was later remanded to police custody till May 10.

“We are aware of the situation that has been reported and we are coordinating
with Pakistani authorities to resolve this matter,” said Meghan Gregonis,
US Embassy spokesperson in Islamabad.
US media reports have identified him as an FBI agent who was in Pakistan to
allegedly train policemen. Karachi police officials have denied knowledge of any such training programme
and said Cox was on a 90-day ‘visit’ visa. 

 

US officials in Washington confirmed that the agent, who is assigned to the FBI
Miami Field Office, was in Pakistan on temporary duty, the Washington Post
reported.
…….
An agent with the US FBI
has been arrested under anti-terrorism laws in Pakistan for carrying
ammunition while trying to board a flight.



The US citizen was detained at Karachi airport after security
staff found 15 bullets for a 9mm handgun in his luggage ahead of a
flight to Islamabad.

American agents operating inside Pakistan have been the cause
of strained relations in the past and have fuelled anti-US feeling in
the country.

In 2011 there was furore when CIA contractor Raymond Davis
was arrested for shooting dead two men following what he said was an
attempted armed robbery in Lahore.

Mr Davis was later released after the families of the dead men accepted “blood money”.

The United States and Pakistan co-operate in the global fight against Islamist militants, angering many Pakistanis.
…….
Link: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-27305754
……
regards

Rashid Rahman Khan

One more great soul (muslim) departs under (unwritten) blasphemy laws- even if you defend a client accused of blasphemy you deserve to die.

Repeating after Omar, things will be worse before they become better. We say this because we have hope for South Asia when it may be that most people have already abandoned hope (we cannot say that they are wrong to do so).
………
Human Rights Advocate Rashid Rehman Khan was gunned down by
unidentified attackers in Multan, DawnNews reported late on Wednesday
night.


Initial reports suggest that Khan’s car was
targeted by the gunmen near Kachehri Chowk. The attack also left two
other people injured.

Advocate Rashid Rehman Khan was a
coordinator for the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP). The
senior lawyer was representing a blasphemy accused and had complained
that he had been receiving threats on his life.

The HRCP had voiced serious concern over the threats extended to Khan.
…….
Link: http://www.dawn.com/news/1104788/rights-advocate-rashid-rehman-khan-gunned-down-in-multan
…….
regards

Boko Haram burns down Gamboru Ngala

Gamborun Ngala is a town in Borno state, Nigeria, 250km from the capital city of Maiduguri, located near the Cameroon border. Actually it WAS a town, now razed to the ground by Boko Haram. This was a highly coordinated attack. Rumors were floated that rebels have been observed in a nearby area with the kidnapped Chibok girls. The military was under tremendous pressure to arrest the rebels. The moment the security forces left town, the attackers came in with rockets, bombs and guns. The official death toll is 300 for now but he actual count will no doubt be much higher.

Nigeria is about to host the World Economic Forum, and the Haramis (to use the term coined by Omar) have decided to take maximum advantage of the media attention.

 

In a separate attack 8 more girls have been kidnapped as well. Short of an immediate occupation of the northern and western provinces by US/UK forces it is unclear what can be done. But even if that unlikely event happens immediately the cry will go up: America is converting Nigeria into Afghanistan (also it is all about Oil).
……
An
attack by Boko Haram Islamists in a northeastern Nigerian town on the
Cameroon border has killed hundreds of people, a local senator and
witnesses said on Wednesday.

 Senator Ahmed Zanna added that the
town of Gamboru Ngala had been left unguarded because the soldiers
based there to protect the population had been redeployed north towards
Lake Chad in an effort to rescue more than 200 schoolgirls kidnapped by
Boko Haram on April 14.

Gunmen riding in armoured vehicles and on motorcycles stormed the town on Monday and razed much of the area.

Residents said survivors fled when the attack began, with the
insurgents firing on civilians as they tried to run to safety into
Cameroon.

Casualty figures had remained unclear in the hours
after the attack because the town had been overrun by extremist fighters
and it was not possible to return to assess the loss of life, witnesses
had previously told AFP. “I have been in constant touch with
Gamboru (Ngala),” Zanna said. “From information reaching me from the
town, the death toll from the attack is around 300,” he added.

“All economic and business centres have been burnt. The market in the
town which attracts traders from all over the area … has been
completely burnt,” he added.

Speaking by phone from Gamboru
Ngala, resident Musa Abba told AFP that the town was “littered with more
than 100 dead bodies,” adding that the search was continuing and the
toll may rise
.

At
least 300 people were confirmed dead on Monday when Boko Haram gunmen
in armoured vehicles stormed Gamborou Ngala town in Borno state.
According
source the security forces earlier deployed to area, moved to the Lake
Chad axis when they received intelligence report that some gunmen were
sighted with abducted schoolgirls moving to the area.
The
insurgents targetted a local market and fired sporadic shots into the
crowd before proceeding into the town to wreak more havoc.
Gamborou,
which is situated along Nigeria-Cameroon border is the administrative
headquatres of Ngala local government of the state, about 200km from
Maiduguri, the capital city.
Senator Ahmed Zannah, who is from the
area confirmed the killings, said the invaders spent 12 hours wreaking
havoc on defenceless civilians.
He said several other persons were
also injured in the attack, while almost all the houses and shops in
the town were burnt down.
Senator zannah, who spoke in a BBC Hausa
report monitored in Maiduguri yesterday said many people were wounded,
while surviving victims rendered homeless as thousands of houses and
shops were burnt by the rampaging gunmen.
He pointed out that the
attackers were armed with dangerous weapons comprising of Armored
Personnel Carries , (APC), Improvised Explosive Devices, (IEDs), petrol
bombs, assault rifles and Rocket Propelled Launchers (RPGs).
“The
attackers stormed the communities in the night when residents were still
sleeping, setting ablaze houses, shops and residents who tried to
escaped from
the fire, were shot ” Shehu said.
He added also that “ About 300 persons were confirmed dead after the incident,
with several others injured. Almost all the houses in the communities
were destroyed by the hoodlums who threw Improvised Explosive Devices
(IEDs) at the
buidings.
My brother who was at the scene of the
attack told me that the actual number of the dead cannot be ascertained
but at least they are upto 300. In fact as we spoke he wept following
the high number of the dead bodies which littered the market”, he
declared.
According to him, the security forces earlier deployed
to area, moved to the Lake Chad axis when they received intelligence
report that some gunmen were sighted with abducted schoolgirls moving to
the area.
“Initially there were many security operatives in the
town to secure it from possible attacks. However upon receiving
information over the movements of insurgents with kidnapped Chibok
schoolgirls towards Lake Chad area,they withdraw and moved further to
confront the gunmen.
It was just an hour after their withdrawal
that the terrorists indaved the town, shooting everyone at sight and
setting buildings on fire. So far 200 vehicles and thousands of houses,
shops and an outfit of the Nigerian Customs Service, (NCS) were all
burnt”, he explained.
A local government official who declined identification also confirmed the casualty figures.
“It
is really a terrible situation, we had wanted to rush relief materials
to the area to provide temporary succor to the victims. But we were
prevailed upon by security agents to shelve our plans on security
reasons”.
The official appealed to the state and Federal Governmenst to assist the area with resources towards rehabilitating the victims.
– See more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/05/boko-haram-misleads-army-kills-300-fresh-borno-attack/#sthash.tGp2d0L4.dpuf

…..
Gamborou, which is situated along Nigeria-Cameroon border is the
administrative headquatres of Ngala local government of the state, about 200km
from Maiduguri, the capital city.

Senator Ahmed Zannah, who is from the area confirmed the killings, said the
invaders spent 12 hours wreaking havoc on defenceless civilians. He said several other persons were also injured in the attack, while almost
all the houses and shops in the town were burnt down.


Senator Zannah, who spoke in a BBC Hausa report monitored in Maiduguri
yesterday said many people were wounded, while surviving victims rendered
homeless as thousands of houses and shops were burnt by the rampaging gunmen.

He pointed out that the attackers were armed with dangerous weapons
comprising of Armored Personnel Carries , (APC), Improvised Explosive Devices,
(IEDs), petrol bombs, assault rifles and Rocket Propelled Launchers (RPGs). “The attackers stormed the communities in the night when residents were
still sleeping, setting ablaze houses, shops and residents who tried to escaped
from the fire, were shot ” he said.

According to him, the security forces earlier deployed to area, moved to the
Lake Chad axis when they received intelligence report that some gunmen were sighted
with abducted schoolgirls moving to the area.

“Initially there were many security operatives in the town to secure it from
possible attacks. However upon receiving information over the movements of
insurgents with kidnapped Chibok schoolgirls towards Lake Chad area,they
withdraw and moved further to confront the gunmen.

It was just an hour after their withdrawal that the terrorists invaded the
town, shooting everyone at sight and setting buildings on fire. So far 200
vehicles and thousands of houses, shops and an outfit of the Nigerian Customs
Service, (NCS) were all burnt”, he explained.

At
least 300 people were confirmed dead on Monday when Boko Haram gunmen
in armoured vehicles stormed Gamborou Ngala town in Borno state.
According
source the security forces earlier deployed to area, moved to the Lake
Chad axis when they received intelligence report that some gunmen were
sighted with abducted schoolgirls moving to the area.
The
insurgents targetted a local market and fired sporadic shots into the
crowd before proceeding into the town to wreak more havoc.
Gamborou,
which is situated along Nigeria-Cameroon border is the administrative
headquatres of Ngala local government of the state, about 200km from
Maiduguri, the capital city.
Senator Ahmed Zannah, who is from the
area confirmed the killings, said the invaders spent 12 hours wreaking
havoc on defenceless civilians.
He said several other persons were
also injured in the attack, while almost all the houses and shops in
the town were burnt down.
Senator zannah, who spoke in a BBC Hausa
report monitored in Maiduguri yesterday said many people were wounded,
while surviving victims rendered homeless as thousands of houses and
shops were burnt by the rampaging gunmen.
He pointed out that the
attackers were armed with dangerous weapons comprising of Armored
Personnel Carries , (APC), Improvised Explosive Devices, (IEDs), petrol
bombs, assault rifles and Rocket Propelled Launchers (RPGs).
“The
attackers stormed the communities in the night when residents were still
sleeping, setting ablaze houses, shops and residents who tried to
escaped from
the fire, were shot ” Shehu said.
He added also that “ About 300 persons were confirmed dead after the incident,
with several others injured. Almost all the houses in the communities
were destroyed by the hoodlums who threw Improvised Explosive Devices
(IEDs) at the
buidings.
My brother who was at the scene of the
attack told me that the actual number of the dead cannot be ascertained
but at least they are upto 300. In fact as we spoke he wept following
the high number of the dead bodies which littered the market”, he
declared.
According to him, the security forces earlier deployed
to area, moved to the Lake Chad axis when they received intelligence
report that some gunmen were sighted with abducted schoolgirls moving to
the area.
“Initially there were many security operatives in the
town to secure it from possible attacks. However upon receiving
information over the movements of insurgents with kidnapped Chibok
schoolgirls towards Lake Chad area,they withdraw and moved further to
confront the gunmen.
It was just an hour after their withdrawal
that the terrorists indaved the town, shooting everyone at sight and
setting buildings on fire. So far 200 vehicles and thousands of houses,
shops and an outfit of the Nigerian Customs Service, (NCS) were all
burnt”, he explained.
A local government official who declined identification also confirmed the casualty figures.
“It
is really a terrible situation, we had wanted to rush relief materials
to the area to provide temporary succor to the victims. But we were
prevailed upon by security agents to shelve our plans on security
reasons”.
The official appealed to the state and Federal Governmenst to assist the area with resources towards rehabilitating the victims.
– See more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/05/boko-haram-misleads-army-kills-300-fresh-borno-attack/#sthash.tGp2d0L4.dpuf

…….
Link: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/05/boko-haram-misleads-army-kills-300-fresh-borno-attack/
…..
regards

The knife attacks in (Chinese) Kashmir

Time flies so fast that most of us have now forgotten that when MH-370 vanished into thin air one of the first questions raised was about the possible role of Uighur militants (there had been a vicious knife attack in Kunming in March, also an Iranian passenger was found to be traveling on a false passport). Well, the knife attacks in China are not stopping, so how will the Chicoms respond? Yes, with overwhelming force, but that does not seem to deter the Islamists.

It is understandable that China does not attract much criticism from Islamic nations on the Uighur problem. This is primarily because Pakistan which benefits significantly from China in all spheres- economic and military in particular- would not like to annoy Big Brother.

The problem now is that Big Brother expects Pakistan to patrol its jihadists so they are not attacking Chinese assets in China and Pakistan (and now in Afghanistan). That is an almost impossible task, since as far as the Islamists are concerned there is no difference between Kashmir and Xinjiang, the infidel rule needs to be replaced with Sharia rule.

If anything the repression in Xinjiang is at a higher level, Chicoms are forcing Uighurs to abandon islamic customs. Even more worrisome is the fact that China has flooded the province with Han migrants to the point where there is actually a Han majority. Here we have  to thank the infamous Article 370, which protects the rights of the Kashmiris against migrant invasions from Bihar and UP.
……………..

The knife attack in which six people were injured
in southern China is the third high-profile incident at a Chinese train
station in a little more than two months. It seems that China is in the
grip of a mounting terrorist campaign, with militants apparently able
to strike when and where they want.

Last week a railway station in Urumqi was attacked with suicide bombs and knives, with at least three killed and dozens injured. The authorities quickly attributed that attack to Uighur separatists.
More jarring, the attack came at the end of President Xi Jinping’s trip
to that city for the explicit purpose of announcing a “get tough”
policy on terrorism.
That incident followed close on the heels of an eerily similar March attack in Kunming.
Details are sketchy, but in that brutal episode approximately nine
militants wielding knives stormed the city’s railway station, killing at
least 28 and wounding about a hundred.
Only a few months before, that there was a high-profile attack
on the most visible symbol of Chinese political authority – Tiananmen
Square in Beijing. In that case, aggrieved Uighurs apparently drove
across the country and mowed down tourists at the edge of the square
with their Jeep before setting it on fire.

While these incidents
have set China on edge, they have received relatively little attention
from the outside world. Western analysts tend to draw on the “low-tech”
weaponry and comparatively low death tolls to conclude that these are
minor incidents. Even specialists often miss the potential for broader
international implications, seeing only an internal separatist struggle.

Both
of these instincts are wrong. Attacks like those in Urumqi, Kunming and
Beijing are serious, and their increasing sophistication indicates a
growing threat. If they continue to escalate, there is potential for
far-reaching consequences for China and the world.

Despite their
reliance on relatively unsophisticated weapons, Uighur militants seem to
have already mastered some of the most challenging problems that
extremist organisations face. The ability to conduct complex,
co-ordinated attacks like those in Urumqi and Kunming are hallmarks of
organisational strength.

Timing an attack
to coincide with Xi’s visit to Xinjiang, explicitly to demonstrate his
toughness on the separatist question, is a clear act of defiance and it
set Chinese social media ablaze before the censors stepped in. The
attackers dramatically undermined any remaining confidence that the
authorities have this situation under control.

Indiscriminate attacks on civilians
always warrant attention, but the evolving violence in China has
under-appreciated potential to develop into global concern. When
al-Qaida struck the United States on 9/11, it reshaped global politics,
culminating in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  

More troubling still, some of the most
militant among the Uighurs have been active at high levels with jihadi
organisations fighting in Afghanistan and Pakistan. As the west winds
down its presence in Afghanistan, it would be prudent to anticipate that
these militants will return their attention to China. 

……..
Link: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/06/terrorism-china-uighur-militants-afghanistan-pakistan
……
regards

Patience Jonathan is (only a lesser) evil

The elites are incapable of protecting the poor from the cruelties of life, not because of lack of resources but because of lack of humanity- they simply feel that the poor are not human beings.

Nigeria is literally burning, the churches, mosques, schools are all on fire, yesterday an entire town was burnt to ashes. The least that is expected from a first lady is to listen patiently to women in distress. But apparently Patience Jonathan has no patience to spare. She is spending her time shouting down the women and threatening them with arrest. The most memorable accusation made against (activist) Naomi Mutah is that she is falsely claiming that her own daughter has been kidnapped!!!
……..
Adding to the growing frustration within Nigeria over the abductions are
reports that Patience Jonathan, Nigeria’s first lady, bizarrely ordered
the arrest of two of the leaders of the protests that had erupted after
the kidnappings of the girls in April, and had even denied the
kidnappings had taken place. 

Patience Jonathan’s office has denied the
reports, but she was quoted by the News Agency of Nigeria as saying, “You are playing games. Don’t use schoolchildren and women for demonstrations again.”
…….


A woman leading protests
over the abduction of more than 200 girls in Nigeria has been detained
on the orders of the president’s wife, activists say. Naomi Mutah took part in a meeting called by First Lady Patience Jonathan and was then taken to a police station, they say.

Mrs Jonathan reportedly felt slighted that the mothers of the abducted girls had sent Ms Mutah to the meeting. Analysts say Mrs Jonathan is a politically powerful figure.

Ms Mutah, a representative of the Chibok community where the
girls were seized from their school more than two weeks ago, last week
organised a protest outside parliament in the capital, Abuja.

The AP news agency quotes another community leader, Saratu Angus
Ndirpaya, as saying that Mrs Jonathan accused the activists of
fabricating the abductions to give the government a bad name. She also said the First Lady accused them of supporting Boko Haram.
…….
Link (1): http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/05/opinion/bergen-boko-haram-stakes/index.html
Link (2): http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27283278
……
regards

Jalliikattu ban

Finally, in one more way (and a bit incrementally) India enters a more civilized world where torturing animals* (response to comments questioning torture: see below) is not accepted in principle (though it will continue in practice). “Centuries old” tradition is well and fine but even Devadasi culture was a “centuries old” tradition and no one defends it (as far as we know). Animals deserve our respect (at least not our abuse) and that is also very much part of our tradition.

The true hero in this battle was Union Minister (for environment) Jairam Ramesh who first initiated a ban in 2011.
The Tamil Nadu govt played politics (no surprise here) and the Ministry of
Environment and Forests (aka Delhi Durbar) was playing coalition politics. The MOEF
made a petition that cruelty to animals was permissible because of “historic, cultural and religious significance of
the event.” So what other backward practice shall we re-instate (de-criminalize) by virtue of this special considerations?

Incidentally we @ BP had called for a ban when the bull abuse (as well as spectator injury) stories surfaced and we are delighted that the Supreme Court agrees. Well done!!
…..
The Supreme Court on Wednesday banned Tamil Nadu’s centuries-old Jallikattu bull fights.
A bench of Justice KS Radhakrishnan and Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose
also asked the centre to amend the law on preventing cruelty to animals
to bring bulls within its ambit.

The court also struck down a 2011 Tamil Nadu law regulating the conduct of Jallikattu. The law provided for conducting Jallikattu from January to May in
various places in Tamil Nadu to ensure the protection of not only the
participants but also of the spectators. The law was enacted in the wake of a large number of deaths and injuries that took place during the sport.

The ban order came as the apex court allowed an appeal by the Animal
Welfare Board of India challenging a Madras high court verdict. 

….. ……. *****Animal
rights groups in India on Wednesday welcomed the Supreme Court order,
banning use of bulls for entertainment like ‘Jallikattu’ (a rural sport
of taming bulls in Tamil Nadu), and called it a landmark judgment.

The groups also praised the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) for
refusing to go by the stand taken by the Tamil Nadu government, the
‘Jallikattu’ Federation and the Union ministry of environment and forest
(MoEF) in the apex court.

The PETA has vigorously campaigned against the use of bulls in these
cruel events. “Its investigators have found that terrified bulls are
deliberately disoriented, have their tails twisted and bitten and are
stabbed, punched, jumped on, and dragged to the ground. During races,
bulls are often hit with nail-studded sticks. In bull fights, the round
ends when one of the bulls is either killed or manages to flee”, said
Valliyate.

The PETA’s campaign to end this abuse was vocally
supported by Bollywood actors Hema Malini and John Abraham, who had both
written to the MoEF calling for Jallikattu to be stopped.

Stating that “May 7, 2014 will go down in the history of India for this
landmark verdict”, Nanditha Krishna, chairperson of the Humane Society
International-India (HSI-India), noted the crucial role played by the
then environment minister Jairam Ramesh for issuing a notification
banning use of bulls as “performing animals” in 2011.
   In its affidavit in the SC, the MoEF had stated:
“In order to strike a balance and to safeguard the interest of all
stakeholders including the animals, while keeping in mind the historic,
cultural and religious significance of the event and with a view to
ensure that no unnecessary pain or suffering is caused to the animals,
participants and spectators, the government of India proposes to exempt
‘bulls’ participating in ‘Jallikattu’ in the state of Tamil Nadu from
the purview of the 2011 notification.”

Reacting to such
contention, HSI-India chairperson said, “There is nothing intellectual
or cultural about fighting bulls. Jallikattu owes its origin to man’s
domestication of cattle, which gave him the draught power of the bull
and milk from the cow…But culture is not static. Just as we have
evolved and given up sati, human sacrifice and child marriage, we must
give up bull baiting and racing bulls too.”

According to the
HSI-India, during Jallikattu, bulls are deliberately terrorized and made
to suffer for entertainment. They are taunted by crowds, their tails
twisted and broken, hit, wrestled to the ground and beaten and prodded
with nail studded sticks, not to mention the chilli powder that is
thrown into their eyes to craze them or the alcohol poured down their
throats.

The Court on Wednesday also noted the penalties for
cruelty to animals under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960
are weak and that the act requires an update.
……..

Link: http://www.firstpost.com/india/sc-bans-jallikattu-bull-fights-in-tamil-nadu-1512583.html
…..
regards

Brown Pundits